<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What we can do as a homeowner to help our Neighborhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://67.40.184.198/Sunrise/?feed=rss2&#038;p=25" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://67.40.184.198/Sunrise/?p=25</link>
	<description>A BLOG to log activity in the Sunrise Terrace neighborhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:19:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav Eide</title>
		<link>http://67.40.184.198/Sunrise/?p=25#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dav Eide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.40.184.198/Sunrise/?p=25#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A thoughtful POST, Kirk.   Maybe we need to consider a new paradigm to improve camera coverage in the neighborhood.  Donations could be used to purchase cameras and we could ask selected neighbors to &quot;host&quot; a camera on their network.   We would have to enable DDNS to be able to manage the camera and the owners of the host network would have to accept and trust the operators of the service (that us) to maintain the security of the owners network.  That would remote the technical responsibility of camera ownership and network management which I think is one of the impediments to placing more camera in the neighborhood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thoughtful POST, Kirk.   Maybe we need to consider a new paradigm to improve camera coverage in the neighborhood.  Donations could be used to purchase cameras and we could ask selected neighbors to &#8220;host&#8221; a camera on their network.   We would have to enable DDNS to be able to manage the camera and the owners of the host network would have to accept and trust the operators of the service (that us) to maintain the security of the owners network.  That would remote the technical responsibility of camera ownership and network management which I think is one of the impediments to placing more camera in the neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
